Suffredin- An Advocate for All of Us  
 

Accountability
Forest Preserves
Public Safety
Cook County Budget
Forest Pres. Budget
Property Tax Appeal
Health & Hospitals
Land Bank Authority
Policy Resolutions
Unsung Heroine

 

   
 
   
   
 
   
     
  Office phone numbers:  
   
 
 

Search current and proposed Cook County Legislation in Larry's exclusive legislative library.

   
 

The Cook County Code of Ordinances are the current laws of Cook County.

   
  Eighteen of the 20 largest banks in the world and more than 50 foreign banks have offices in Cook County.
   
     
     
     



Sheriff, judge joust over jail inmates

Thursday, November 08, 2007
Daily Law Bulletin
by Stephanie Potter

At a contentious hearing Thursday, Chief Cook County Judge Timothy C. Evans and Sheriff Thomas J. Dart debated whose office should be responsible for deciding which jail inmates to release and put on electronic monitoring.
Evans and Dart appeared before the Cook County Board's Finance Committee, which is conducting hearings on the 2008 budget. Commissioners wanted to hear from Dart, Evans and State's Attorney Richard A. Devine about jail overcrowding and criminal cases that some contend are not moving through the court system fast enough.
Dart said electronic monitoring could be a valuable ''relief valve'' to reduce overcrowding in the County Jail. However, Dart wants judges, rather than his office, to determine which inmates should be placed on electronic monitoring.
The county is operating under a federal consent decree meant to reduce overcrowding, but Dart and Evans vigorously disagree over whether the decree mandates that only the sheriff is responsible for deciding who should be released, or whether the court system should have a role. Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1984).
The debate first arose in February, when Dart backed state legislation that would make Cook County judges responsible for deciding which inmates should be transferred from the jail to electronic monitoring. The measure, House Bill 2749, is now in the Senate Rules Committee.
Dart told the commissioners that the electronic-monitoring system as it is currently run is reckless.
He said judges, because of their training and experience, are much better suited to decide who should be released on electronic monitoring. He also pointed out that judges have immunity for those types of decisions, while sheriff's officials could be sued if a detainee on electronic monitoring commits another crime.
Evans, however, countered that judges' decisions on bond are, by law, meant only to protect the public and ensure the defendant's presence at future court hearings.
''There's nothing in the statute that permits the judge to even consider anything that is going on in the jail at this particular point,'' Evans said.
However, there appeared to be a possibility for compromise when it comes to defendants' initial bond hearings.
Evans said that if judges are to be involved in determining which detainees are eligible for electronic monitoring, he wants the County Board to fund a pretrial investigation agency to screen defendants. Such an agency would cost about $1 million to establish, Evans said.
That agency would recommend to the court whether a detainee should be eligible for electronic monitoring. If the judge deemed the inmate eligible at the initial bond hearing, the inmate would be sent directly to the sheriff to be enlisted in the program, Evans said.
The pretrial agency also could work with the sheriff's office on which members of the current jail population could be deemed eligible for electronic monitoring, Evans said.
''The judges will make that decision initially,'' Evans. ''But when there's an issue of overcrowding, not bail, then that's when the federal court [consent decree] says that decision should be made by the sheriff.''
Evans also said he would institute a sliding-scale fee schedule for inmates to be put on electronic monitoring, although he and Dart disagreed as to whether that could be profitable for the county.
Evans said, ''I want to remind you, they're in jail because they have no money [for bail].''
But Dart said many inmates have large commissary accounts for junk food, so they likely could afford to pay some fee for electronic monitoring.
Commissioner Timothy O. Schneider, concerned about litigation expenses, asked Evans why judges can't determine who should be released from jail and put on electronic monitoring. Evans said the answer isn't simply immunity, but making sure that judges and the sheriff's office have the needed information about whether a detainee should be released on electronic monitoring.
''The judge doesn't have any clairvoyance about whether that person is going to commit an offense while out on bail,'' Evans said.



Recent Headlines

Cook County board to vote on new budget today
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
WGN Channel 9

Preckwinkle agrees to fewer Cook County job cuts; hundreds of layoffs still in works
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Chicago Tribune

Teamsters Local 700 Files for Temporary Restraining Order Against Cook County Merit Board
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Special to suffredin.org

How Cook County finally got a new budget
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Crain's Chicago Business

ONTIVEROS: I think I miss that soda pop tax
Monday, November 20, 2017
Chicago Sun-Times

Budget Cuts Expected For Cook County Public Guardian’s Office
Monday, November 20, 2017
CBS Chicago

Ex-Cook County Board President Todd Stroger says he's running again
Monday, November 20, 2017
Chicago Tribune

More than 300 Cook County employees will lose jobs to balance budget
Monday, November 20, 2017
Chicago Sun-Times

Cook County Jail Population Down 15 Percent After Bond Reforms
Monday, November 20, 2017
WTTW Chicago Tonight

Stroger vs. Preckwinkle: Hide your wallets.
Monday, November 20, 2017
Chicago Tribune

After momentous week, prosecutor Kim Foxx says 'we have to right wrongs'
Monday, November 20, 2017
Chicago Tribune

Police union president slams Foxx, prosecutors after exonerations
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Chicago Sun-Times

MIHALOPOULOS: Will pop-tax anger unseat Preckwinkle, or fizzle out?
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Chicago Sun-Times

After Warning of 'Painful Cuts,' Preckwinkle to Unveil 2018 Budget Amendment
Friday, November 17, 2017
NBC Chicago

Watchdog: Quit stalling on Cook County justice system data
Friday, November 17, 2017
Crain's Chicago Business

The Week in Review: Record Wave of Exonerations Tied to Rogue Cop
Friday, November 17, 2017
WTTW Chicago Tonight

Preckwinkle, some commissioners say enough votes for amended budget
Friday, November 17, 2017
Chicago Sun-Times

Preckwinkle: Nothing Pleasant About Hundreds Of Layoffs
Friday, November 17, 2017
CBS Chicago

Cook County commissioners get behind Preckwinkle's budget cuts
Friday, November 17, 2017
Chicago Tribune

Chuy Garcia Sole Cook County Commissioner Iffy on Budget
Friday, November 17, 2017
WTTW Chicago Tonight

all news items

Paid for by Larry Suffredin and not at taxpayer expense. A Haymarket Production.
^ TOP