Suffredin- For a Better Cook County  

Forest Preserves
Public Safety
Cook County Budget
Forest Pres. Budget
Property Tax Appeal
Health & Hospitals
Land Bank Authority
Policy Resolutions
Unsung Heroine


  Office phone numbers:  

The Cook County Code of Ordinances are the current laws of Cook County.


Search current and proposed Cook County Legislation in Larry's exclusive legislative library.

  Cook County is the second most populous county in the nation. It is the 19th largest government in the U.S.

TEXT-Fitch rates Cook County, Ill. GO bonds 'AA-'

Monday, November 05, 2012

Nov 5 - Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'AA-' rating to the following Cook
County, Illinois (the county) bonds:

--Approximately 247.8 million general obligation (GO) refunding bonds, series

In addition, Fitch has affirmed the 'AA-' rating for $3.7 billion of outstanding
GO bonds.

The Rating Outlook is Negative.


The GO bonds carry the county's full faith and credit and ad valorem tax pledge,
without limitation as to rate or amount.


NEGATIVE RATING OUTLOOK: The Negative Rating Outlook reflects Fitch's concern
that spending pressures coupled with reliance on economically sensitive taxes
will continue to strain the county's ability to achieve structural balance and
build reserves in the intermediate term.

CHALLENGING FINANCIAL PROSPECTS: The county is projecting budgetary structural
imbalance for the next several fiscal years, although the projected gaps are
smaller than those previously projected; the county projects it will
successfully close the gap in fiscal 2012.

REGIONAL ECONOMIC HUB: Cook County is the economic and cultural hub for the
Midwest region.

RESTORED LIQUIDITY: Liquidity was restored to adequate levels via bond proceeds
last year that reimbursed the general fund for accumulated judgment and
self-insurance losses.

HEALTH SYSTEM WAIVER: The recent receipt of a federal waiver expanding Medicaid
eligibility, which was anticipated, is expected to net $99 million in additional
revenue in fiscal 2013, shoring up the county health system which has strained
county finances in recent years.

NOTABLE OBLIGATIONS: The overall debt burden is moderate; however, pension
liabilities are notable, and annual funding remains significantly lower than
actuarial funding requirements.


PERSISTENT STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE: Management's inability to restore structural
financial equilibrium and preserve satisfactory fund balance levels at the
current rating level would likely result in a downgrade.

MOUNTING FIXED COSTS: Management's inability to develop a realistic plan to
address mounting fixed costs, including pensions, would put negative pressure on
the rating.


Cook County, the second largest county in the nation with 5.2 million residents,
serves as the economic and cultural center for the Chicago metropolitan region.
The city of Chicago, which is located within the county, accounts for roughly
50% of the county's total assessed valuation and population. Socioeconomic
indicators are mixed with above-average per capita income and educational levels
but also elevated individual poverty and unemployment rates. As of August 2012,
the county's unemployment rate of 9.3% remained above both the state (8.9%) and
national (8.2%) averages, but showed marked improvement over the 11.1% recorded
a year prior.


Cook County, and in particular the city of Chicago, acts as the economic engine
for the Midwest region. Residents are afforded abundant employment opportunities
within this deep and diverse regional economy. The county also benefits from an
extensive infrastructure network, including a vast rail system, which supports
continued growth. The employment base is represented by all major sectors with
concentrations in the wholesale trade, professional and business services and
financial sectors.


The county is in the process of rolling back the rate for its sales tax, which
represents a significant portion of the revenue stream. The home rule sales tax
was increased by 1% to 1.75% in July 2008 to fortify the county's budget. The
new county administration rolled back the sales tax to 1.25% effective July
2010, which cost the county $27 million in fiscal 2010 and $161 million in 2011.
Per a county ordinance, the sales tax was rolled back again, to 1.0% effective
January 2012. A final rollback, to 0.75% is planned for January 2013.
Year-over-year sales tax revenues are projected to drop 9.1% in fiscal 2012,
reflective of the roll-back, mitigated by moderate underlying increase in
normalized sales tax activity.

The county recently issued bonds backed by its sales tax revenue, but Fitch does
not expect such borrowing to significantly impact the amount of revenue
available for operations. The bonds funded projects previously funded on a
pay-go basis from motor fuel tax proceeds, freeing up those revenues for


Financial operations have been continuously weakening since fiscal 2006 when the
unreserved general fund balance equaled a healthy 20% ($259.5 million) of
spending. The unreserved general fund balance dropped to a very low 2.3% ($30.8
million) of spending by fiscal 2010.

The fiscal 2011 budget process began with a $487 million general fund forecast
gap in large part attributable to a $161 million reduction in sale tax revenues
due to full-year impact of the roll back.

The county ended fiscal 2011 with a net operating surplus (after transfers) of
$136 million. The surplus was attributable to a mix of structural solutions,
including staffing and operational reductions and enhanced revenue collections,
and one-time sources including debt restructuring and a line of credit (for a
one-time cost).

Year-end liquidity was restored to adequate levels of almost two months of
expenditures, up from a slim three days in fiscal 2010, and the unrestricted
general fund balance (the sum of the unassigned, assigned, and committed fund
balance under GASB 54) climbed to a much healthier $197.1 million or 13.8% of
expenditures and transfers out. Liquidity should be enhanced further by this
year's on time issuance of second installment property tax bills, for the first
time in 34 years.

The general fund budget gap for fiscal 2012, originally projected at $315
million, is now projected to be eliminated. The county reports it was able to
close the gap through a hiring freeze, lower election-related costs, contractual
savings, and better than budget sales tax revenue. Fitch believes the projection
is reasonable, given year-to-date results showing close to even operations with
two months left in the fiscal year. The county has taken aggressive steps to
control personnel costs through both attrition and layoffs; the county's
personnel headcount has declined 7.4% since 2010, and now stands at 22,994.

Budgetary pressures will continue in fiscal 2013. The 2013 proposed budget
identifies a $267.5 million gap which the county plans to resolve with $50.7
million of expenditure reductions and $216.8 million of new revenues. The
largest of the new revenues is an expected $99 million the health system is
expected to net as a result of a recently obtained federal waiver allowing for
an expansion of Medicaid eligibility. The next largest new revenue category is
an assortment of proposed new taxes, valued at $43.4 million, including those on
cigarettes, gaming machines, guns, and the implementation of a non-titled use
tax on large out-of-county purchases.

Proposed expenditure cuts include the elimination of 462 positions, reducing
health care and benefits costs, energy and procurement savings, and managed
competition of custodial work.

The new revenues and expenditure cuts are included in the proposed budget plan,
which has not yet been adopted. The composition and amount of savings may change
as the budget goes through the political process before final adoption in the
next several weeks.

While closing the budget gap (equivalent to 11.8% of spending) will present a
formidable challenge to the county, Fitch notes that it is smaller than the
preliminary gaps identified for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, which were $487
million and $315 million, respectively. The county's ability to successfully
address its budget gaps and institute structurally balanced operations is
instrumental to rating stability.


Fitch expects the receipt of the federal waiver expanding Medicaid eligibility
will improve the health system's, and therefore, the county's financial profile.
The county's hospital healthcare system, which is classified as an enterprise
fund on a GAAP basis, has been a source of operating pressure due to a
consistent history of operating deficits. The system generated a $472 million
operating deficit in fiscal 2011, which was only partially offset through a
combination of property, sales, and cigarette taxes amounting to $252 million.
Further deficits and continued subsidization from discretionary revenue sources
are likely, which may impact the county's overall financial flexibility.

The county is shifting focus to out-patient care, improving Medicaid billing
collections, and increasing procedural efficiencies through infrastructure and
technological upgrades, in an effort to improve cost efficiency. The health
system's revenue structure is likely to materially improve by an estimated $99
million (net of associated expenses) in 2013, as a result of the waiver. The
exact magnitude of the net revenue improvement is dependent upon the number and
pace of new enrollments, and Fitch notes that the new enrollments and their
associated revenues will be vulnerable to competition beginning in 2014; the
county has identified offsetting health system expenditure reductions should the
numbers fall short of anticipated levels.


Cook County's aggregate debt burden is moderate at $3,993 per capita and 4% of
full market value. The county's debt profile includes a reasonable 13% of
unhedged variable-rate debt that is supported by liquidity facilities, the
earliest of which expires in 2015. The capital improvement plan through fiscal
2016 totals roughly $700 million, of which $295 million is expected to be bond

Principal amortization is below average with 36% repaid within 10 years, and is
expected to slow slightly with the current issue. The refunding is designed to
produce significant present value savings, estimated at 14%. The refunding
generates even or positive savings in all years, with most of the savings
concentrated in 2013-2016, and extends the average life of the refunded bonds by
9.5% or less than one year. The concentrated savings, along with the application
of accumulated variable rate debt-related savings, will allow the county to
gradually ramp up debt service requirements to a sustained higher level
beginning in 2016.

Long-term liabilities related to employment benefits are considerable. The
county provides pension benefits to its employees through a single employer
defined benefit plan. As of December 2011, the unfunded actuarial accrued
liability (UAAL) totaled $4.7 billion, or 59.3% funded based on Fitch's more
conservative 7% investment return assumption.

Compounding the issue, the county's pension contribution of approximately $156
million in fiscal 2011 is well short of the actuarial required contribution of
$474 million. The county has not paid its full annual pension cost for at least
the last five years; the county's property tax levy for pension liabilities is
capped by state statute and management has not addressed the shortfall. County
officials are currently pursuing several avenues including state legislative
changes to ameliorate the funding ratio shortfall.

As a credit positive, the county implemented a two-tiered benefit plan for
employees beginning in January 2011, which should help moderate future liability
growth. Other post employee benefits are also offered to retirees and their
dependents. The county contributed $38 million, which equaled the pay-as-you-go
amount, in fiscal 2011.

Additional information is available at ''. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Tax-Supported
Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from
Creditscope, University Financial Associates, S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index,
IHS Global Insight, National Association of Realtors, Underwriter, Bond Counsel,
and Financial Advisor.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012);
--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria

Recent Headlines

Measles Exposure Reported in Chicago
Monday, May 20, 2019

News from the Cook County Health System
Friday, May 17, 2019
Special to

Cook County Health Recognizes Mental Health Awareness Month
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Daily Herald

Skokie plans for road improvements near Edens Expressway: 'It’s desperately needed'
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Skokie Review

5 Chicago hospitals earn D grades for patient safety in new report, Northwestern slips to a B
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Chicago Daily Law Bulletin: Backward Glances
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

Cook County Eliminated Its Gang Database, But Advocates Say Harm Continues
Wednesday, May 15, 2019

New Cook County Housing Authority Proposal Targets the 'Missing Middle'
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Evanston RoundTable

Census Citizenship Question Could Hurt Citizens, Noncitizens Alike
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
WBEZ Chicago Public Radio

News from Friends of the Forest Preserves
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Special to

Cook County commissioners get earful about soon-to-be-destroyed gang database
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Detainee dies days after suicide attempt at Cook County jail
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Curious City How Chicago Women Created The World’s First Juvenile Justice System
Monday, May 13, 2019
WBEZ Chicago Public Radio

Cook County report: Sharp drop in jail population, but crime did not jump
Friday, May 10, 2019
Injustice Watch

Will Cook County be home to the next big measles outbreak? Researchers think so.
Friday, May 10, 2019
Chicago Tribune

May is Prime Time for Birding in the Forest Preserves of Cook County
Thursday, May 09, 2019
Special to

More Babies Are Illegally Abandoned Than Turned Over Through Illinois’ Safe Haven Law In Cook County
Thursday, May 09, 2019
CBS Chicago

Empty businesses may lose county tax incentives
Wednesday, May 08, 2019
Homewood-Flossmoor Chronicle

As new DCFS report highlights failures, Cook County guardian says 'inept' child welfare agency is ‘not doing its job ... at every level’
Tuesday, May 07, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Cook County passes bill to stop discrimination against tenant applicants
Tuesday, May 07, 2019
Chicago Crusader

all news items

Paid for by Larry Suffredin and not at taxpayer expense. A Haymarket Production.