Suffredin- An Advocate for All of Us  
 

Accountability
Forest Preserves
Public Safety
Cook County Budget
Forest Pres. Budget
Property Tax Appeal
Health & Hospitals
Land Bank Authority
Policy Resolutions
Unsung Heroine

 

   
 
   
   
 
   
     
  Office phone numbers:  
   
 
 

The Cook County Code of Ordinances are the current laws of Cook County.

   
 

Search current and proposed Cook County Legislation in Larry's exclusive legislative library.

   
  Eighteen of the 20 largest banks in the world and more than 50 foreign banks have offices in Cook County.
   
     
     
     



Judge tosses ‘puppy mill’ lawsuit

Friday, May 29, 2015
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin
by Patricia Manson

A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit challenging an ordinance that bars suburban pet stores from obtaining dogs, cats or rabbits from large commercial breeders.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly is allowing the plaintiffs a few days to fix problems in their suit and file an amended complaint. But in his written opinion, he suggested the challenge to Cook County’s “puppy mill” ordinance still won’t have much more than a dog’s chance.

The preamble to the Companion Animal and Consumer Protection Ordinance says the measure is aimed at stopping the retail sale of pets that come from “mass-breeding facilities that churn out puppies with an emphasis on profit over welfare.”

Kennelly rejected the statutory and constitutional arguments the Missouri Pet Breeders Association and three pet store owners raised against the ordinance.

“While it is highly unlikely that plaintiffs can cure the complaint’s defects by amendment, the court will give them a chance to try,” Kennelly wrote. “Unless plaintiffs filed a proposed amended complaint no later than June 11, 2015, that states a viable federal claim, the court will enter judgment in favor of defendants.”

The lead attorney for the plaintiffs, David J. Fish of The Fish Law Firm P.C. in Naperville, said his clients will make the necessary changes and refile the lawsuit.

“We do plan on proceeding full speed ahead,” he said. “We believe that the case has merit.”

Bruce A. Wagman of Schiff, Hardin LLP’s San Francisco office doesn’t see it that way.

Wagman represents the Humane Society of the United States and The Puppy Mill Project in other cases involving the regulation of puppy mills.

“There’s just nothing good about it,” he said of breeding animals in mills.

In a statement, Cook County State’s Attorney Anita M. Alvarez thanked lawyers in her office for their work on the case.

Defending the ordinance were Assistant State’s Attorneys Jayman A. Avery III and Kent S. Ray.

The case is Missouri Pet Breeders Association, et al. v. County of Cook, et al., No. 14 C 6930.

Kennelly is the second federal judge to consider — and turn aside — a challenge to legislation regulating puppy mills.

On March 31, Chief U.S. District Judge William E. Smith of the District of Rhode Island upheld East Providence, R.I.’s puppy mill ordinance.

Other challenges to some of the ordinances adopted by 70 or so municipalities are pending.

For example, a Missouri breeder and two Chicago pet stores are among the plaintiffs challenging the city’s puppy mill ordinance. Park Pet Shop Inc., et al. v. City of Chicago, et al., No. 15 C 1450. That case is pending before U.S. District Judge Jorge L. Alonso.

Both the Chicago and the Cook County ordinances are on hold until the respective suits are resolved.

Cook County’s ordinance allows suburban pet stores to obtain dogs, cats and rabbits only from nonprofit or government-operated entities or from federally licensed breeders who use no more than five female animals a year to produce their stock.

About three weeks before the ordinance was to go into effect on Oct. 1, the breeders association and the other plaintiffs filed their suit.

In addition to Cook County, defendants in the suit were Board President Toni Preckwinkle and Donna Alexander, director of the Department of Animal and Rabies Control.

The plaintiffs alleged the ordinance was pre-empted by state and federal law and exceeded the county’s home-rule powers under the Illinois Constitution.

But in his opinion last week, Kennelly held the Illinois General Assembly “has not expressly barred local governments from exercising power in the field of animal control.”

Kennelly also rejected the argument that the ordinance violates the equal protection clause by distinguishing between large and smaller breeding facilities.

That distinction “is rationally related to a legitimate government interest” in reducing the number of animals sold in the county that are obtained from mass-breeding facilities, Kennelly wrote.

And he held the ordinance does not burden interstate commerce by limiting the number of breeders from which Cook County stores may buy animals and thereby limiting the number of pure- and speciality-bred pets they can offer to their customers.

Kennelly conceded that customers might respond to the shortage of certain types of animals in stores by buying them directly from breeders.

“But a law does not burden interstate commerce if it shifts business from one in-state firm to another in-state firm,” he wrote.

Kennelly also was not persuaded by the argument that the ordinance impairs contracts — including building leases, franchise agreements and contracts to buy pets from particular breeders — in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

If a “significant and legitimate public purpose” justifies an ordinance, Kennelly wrote, quoting Chicago Board of Realtors Inc. v. City of Chicago, 819 F.2d 732 (7th Cir. 1987), it passes muster if its effect on contracts “is reasonable and appropriate” in light of that purpose.

And Kennelly rejected the notion that the ordinance is vague, writing that “a person of ordinary intelligence” would not be confused by its provisions.

Wagman said he is pleased with the ruling.

Animals suffer when they were bred in facilities with cramped living quarters and inadequate enrichment and veterinary care, he said.

People who adopt sick or unsocialized animals, Wagman said, often are unable to address those problems and either euthanize the animal or turn it over to government-run shelters.

And then taxpayers end up footing the bill for the care or euthanization of these animals, he said.



Recent Headlines

Cook County Public Defender Amy Campanelli on Gun Violence, Police Database.
Monday, August 26, 2019
WTTW

Assessor: Homes values, sale prices up in Schaumburg Township
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Daily Herald

Home improvement grant designed to get the lead out
Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Cook County census panel seeks outreach help for hard-to-count communities
Monday, August 19, 2019

Cook County Land Bank Authority Announces Opening of Registration to Give Away a Free Home
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
The Chicago Crusader

NEW ILLINOIS LAW ENDS $120 FEE TO CLEAR FALSE CRIMINAL RECORDS IN COOK COUNTY
Friday, August 09, 2019
Illinois Policy

America’s most interesting sheriff
Friday, August 09, 2019

Top Cook County Jail chess players take on the world
Wednesday, August 07, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Public defender takes shots at Chicago Police gun offender webpage
Wednesday, August 07, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Commentary: Data alone won’t stop Chicago gun violence; Cook County needs a public ‘Violence Reduction Dashboard’
Wednesday, August 07, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Cook County Jail detainees take on inmates around the world in online chess tournament
Tuesday, August 06, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Here’s What You Need To Know About The Ongoing Bail Debate In Chicago
Monday, August 05, 2019
WBEZ Chicago Public Radio

Cook County Jail hosts international chess tournament
Monday, August 05, 2019
WGN Chicago

Cook County property taxes are due today, Aug. 1.
Thursday, August 01, 2019
Special to suffredin.org

Forest Preserves of Cook County Celebrate Dan Ryan Woods Investments
Thursday, August 01, 2019
Chicago Defender

Cook County TIFs generate $1.2 billion
Thursday, August 01, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Changes coming to Cook County assessor’s office
Thursday, August 01, 2019
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

In Chicago, TIF Revenues Soaring
Wednesday, July 31, 2019
WTTW News

A controversial tax subsidy program will generate a record $1.2 billion in revenue. Here’s what the number means for Chicago.
Wednesday, July 31, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Group to rally in support of Kim Foxx as challengers emerge
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Crain's Chicago Business

all news items

Paid for by Larry Suffredin and not at taxpayer expense. A Haymarket Production.
^ TOP