Suffredin- Changing County Government  

Forest Preserves
Public Safety
Cook County Budget
Forest Pres. Budget
Property Tax Appeal
Health & Hospitals
Land Bank Authority
Policy Resolutions
Unsung Heroine


  Office phone numbers:  

The Cook County Code of Ordinances are the current laws of Cook County.


Search current and proposed Cook County Legislation in Larry's exclusive legislative library.

  Last year more people used the County's forest preserves than visited Yellowstone National Park.

Judge bucks Cook County law, says boys as young as 10 can be locked up

Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Chicago Tribune
by AnnaSporrer

Juvenile Temporary Detention Center

Jose M. Osorio/Chicago Tribune
A room at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center. A judge who ordered that two 12-year-old boys remain locked up there said none of the 15 Juvenile Court judges "subscribe to the notion that detention is an appropriate placement for young minors."
A room at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center. A judge who ordered that two 12-year-old boys remain locked up there said none of the 15 Juvenile Court judges "subscribe to the notion that detention is an appropriate placement for young minors." (Jose M. Osorio/Chicago Tribune)
Chicago Tribune

A Cook County judge on Wednesday declined to follow a new local ordinance that bans boys 12 and younger from being sent to the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center, ordering that two 12-year-olds remain confined there.

Juvenile Court Presiding Judge Michael Toomin said a state law allowing children as young as 10 to be locked up not only trumps the county ordinance under the state's constitution but also does a better job of protecting the public. Both boys have gun charges on their records, and both ran away from home after being charged.

"These minors represent a clear and present threat to society to the extent that only secure placement is appropriate," Toomin wrote in a court order. "The county's ordinance offers little aid or guidance in the processing and placement of this cohort of our minors."

Public defenders for both boys said they would appeal the ruling, but in the meantime the boys will remain in the detention center on the West Side. They appeared in court in matching maroon sweatshirts and navy sweatpants, their handcuffed hands behind their backs.

The Cook County Board of Commissioners had unanimously passed the ordinance a little more than a month ago. “Maybe this helps us understand how we get more resources to help these children be able to be stronger as they get older," the bill's sponsor, Larry Suffredin, D-Evanston, told the Sun-Times last month.

Suffredin did not answer phone calls and an email late Wednesday afternoon. A spokeswoman for County Board President Toni Preckwinkle said she had not seen the judge’s order and couldn’t comment.

The two boys were both arrested on suspicion of armed robbery, among other charges, and were initially released on electronic monitoring. Shortly after the ordinance was passed, they were ordered to the detention center because they repeatedly damaged their electronic monitors and ran away, according to court records.

Their lawyers filed an emergency petition Oct. 4, arguing the decision violated county law. The ordinance, they contended, "provides a stronger protection for a minor's liberty than the (state) Juvenile Court Act."

In his ruling, Toomin called the detention of young children one that "has long been a daunting task confronting our judiciary." But he argued that the county law makes the judges' jobs more "problematic" because it provides no "viable alternative" to incarceration.

The assumption that facilities already exist for children who pose a public threat "is far removed from reality," he said. A judge who sent one of the boys to the detention center even called on the County Board "to find some form of secure placement ... as an alternative to the Juvenile Temporary Detention Center."

While the number of young juveniles who are detained is relatively small, Toomin contended that does not take away the need for a secure facility for children as young as 10, calling them "heavy hitters."

"Although a minimal number of juveniles adjudicated by our court are under the age of 13, the few that do appear before our judges are often heavy hitters facing charges of armed robbery and other serious felonies," he wrote.

Before the boys were detained, they were fitted with electronic monitors and placed with their parents or a shelter. "Unfortunately, as with petitioners, an inordinate number persist in destroying their monitoring devices and absconding the jurisdiction of our court," Toomin said.

READ MORE: Giving Chicago juveniles in detention a glimpse of a different future »

None of the 15 Juvenile Court judges, he added, "subscribe to the notion that detention is an appropriate placement for young minors."

But there are cases, like the 12-year-olds, when it's determined that boys are not only a threat to the public but also to themselves, Toomin said. So detention can also offer protection, he contended.

A judge who handled one of the boys' cases said following the county ordinance and keeping the boy out of the detention center "would be creating a 12-year-old who is at liberty to ignore his mother, at liberty to ignore the court and put himself in extreme danger."

The judge in the other case noted how the boy repeatedly ran away and "was not acting in his best interest, and God only knew what he may get into."

Toomin concluded, "If the concept of public protection heralded in our Juvenile Court Act means anything, it must ensure that where detention is foreclosed, as the ordinance indeed mandates, there must be a viable alternative. That alternative is presently missing from the equation."




Recent Headlines

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Special to

Cook County Assessor’s Office Publicly Releases Residential Assessment Code and Models
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Special to

EDITORIAL: Long in the MWRD pipeline, IG plan needs a yes vote
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Cook County Health Cuts Ribbon on Outpatient Center in Arlington Heights
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Daily Herald

Celebrate Earth Day with the Forest Preserves of Cook County
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Special to

Homeowners in Chicago have just a few weeks to get current on their 2017 property taxes - or risk losing their homes. WBEZ’s Odette Yousef reports.
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
WBEZ Chiacgo Public Radio

Editorial: The Foxx-Smollett questions for Inspector General Blanchard
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Cook County pet owners warned of spring coyote dangers
Monday, April 15, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Cook County inspector general to review prosecutors' handling of Jussie Smollett case
Saturday, April 13, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Foxx requests Cook County IG investigation into handling of Jussie Smollett case
Friday, April 12, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

A challenge to one of Chicago's biggest draws for companies
Friday, April 12, 2019
Crain's Chicago Business

What Evanston's assessments tell us about the new assessor's new math
Friday, April 12, 2019
Crain's Chicago Business

$3.85 million granted in lawsuit against ex-Cook County forest preserve worker charged in fatal on-the-job crash
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Chicago Tribune

A Day in the Life of a Cook County Burn Crew
Wednesday, April 10, 2019

EDITORIAL: Splitting up the region’s sanitation board is an idea that stinks
Monday, April 08, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Lawmakers Look To Keep 10-Year-Olds Out Of Jail
Thursday, April 04, 2019

Property Tax Workshops Help Homeowners Appeal Assessments
Wednesday, April 03, 2019
Evanston RoundTable

Large crowds of Evanston residents turn out to appeal property tax assessments
Tuesday, April 02, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Family of slain cabbie accuses Cook County state's attorney's office of dodging FOIA request
Monday, April 01, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Property Tax Appeal Seminar Set For New Trier Township Residents
Monday, April 01, 2019
Journal and Topics Online

all news items

Paid for by Larry Suffredin and not at taxpayer expense. A Haymarket Production.