Suffredin- For a Better Cook County  
 

Accountability
Forest Preserves
Public Safety
Cook County Budget
Forest Pres. Budget
Property Tax Appeal
Health & Hospitals
Land Bank Authority
Policy Resolutions
Unsung Heroine

 

   
 
   
   
 
   
     
  Office phone numbers:  
   
 
 

The Cook County Code of Ordinances are the current laws of Cook County.

   
 

Search current and proposed Cook County Legislation in Larry's exclusive legislative library.

   
  The Chicago Board of Trade and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange trade 60% of the world futures contracts.
   
     
     
     



Cook County freed from federal oversight

Thursday, November 01, 2018
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin
by Patricia Manson

Cook County freed from federal oversight

By Patricia Manson Law Bulletin staff writer
Anti-patronage attorney Michael L. Shakman poses in his office in 2009. On Wednesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier granted a motion to end federal oversight for some branches of Cook County government. Shakman, who was present in Schenkier’s courtroom, said patronage-free government is not “an impossible dream.” — AP Photo/M. Spencer Green
Posted November 1, 2018 11:03 AM

Praising the battle Michael L. Shakman has waged against political patronage in government hiring, a federal judge on Wednesday dismissed Cook County as a defendant in the lawsuit the Chicago lawyer filed 49 years ago.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier granted a motion to end federal oversight of the county’s hiring and promotion practices.

Schenkier granted the motion after finding the county is in substantial compliance with a settlement agreement — termed an agreed supplemental relief order — it reached in November 2006 with Shakman and his fellow plaintiffs.

“This is a big day,” Schenkier said during a hearing in the Dirksen Federal Courthouse. “This is a day where we see we don’t have to be trapped by the past, we don’t have to be trapped by the history of things.”

He said the settlement agreement shows what can be accomplished when people cooperate with one another.

And he said the agreement sends a message to other government entities still involved in the litigation.

“Substantial compliance is not an impossible dream,” Schenkier said. “It is an achievable goal.”

Shakman, of Miller Shakman & Beem LLP, was among the parties and attorneys in the case who spoke during the hearing.

Shakman described the hearing as an “historic moment” in the litigation he began in 1969.

“Patronage practices hurt a lot of interests which are important in our country,” he said.

He said basing employment decisions on a worker’s political loyalties and activities deprives individuals of their First Amendment rights.

Patronage practices deprive the public of government workers who are chosen for their qualifications, Shakman said.

He said patronage practices also hurt democracy by “hijacking public resources” to help incumbents.

And he said a patronage system encourages elected officials to hire too many workers.

Shakman said former federal judge Wayne R. Andersen and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle are among the people responsible for bringing the county into compliance.

Andersen presided over the Shakman litigation for about 10 years before retiring from the bench in July 2010. He was among the spectators at the hearing.

Andersen encouraged the parties to work together and took such concrete steps as appointing a monitor to oversee the county’s compliance with the law, Shakman said.

He said Preckwinkle — unlike other officials who exhibited “varying degrees of enthusiasm” for reform — worked hard to bring the county into substantial compliance.

Preckwinkle said the hearing “marks an important milestone” in the county’s history.

“Unlawful political discrimination will not be tolerated in the county,” she said.

Schenkier’s finding of substantial compliance applies to the county and to three units independent of the president — the Cook County Public Defender’s Office, the Cook County Health and Hospitals System and the Office of the Independent Inspector General.

Speakers at the hearing included Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney Daniel H. Brennan Jr. and Dr. John Jay Shannon, CEO of the Health and Hospitals System.

Amy P. Campanelli heads the public defender’s office and Patrick M. Blanchard oversees the inspector general’s office.

In addition to the county, government entities that have been dismissed from the litigation are the city of Chicago, the Cook County Sheriff’s Office and the Cook County Forest Preserve District.

Defendants still involved in the litigation are the Illinois governor’s office, the Cook County Court Clerk’s Office and the Cook County Recorder of Deeds’ Office and Assessor’s Office.

In the litigation involving Cook County, Andersen appointed Julia M. Nowicki in late 2006 as the compliance administrator.

Mary T. Robinson was selected to take the post in March 2009 after Nowicki resigned because of demands on her time as a neutral and consultant for a law firm.

Complying with the settlement agreement has cost the county about $8 million since 2006.

That amount includes about $3 million paid to resolve 108 claims filed by individuals who maintained their careers were affected by patronage demands.

After Wednesday’s hearing, Robinson said the money was well spent.

The county could have paid a consultant $8 million and not achieved the results seen under the settlement agreement, she said.

At the hearing, Robinson said there has been “a dramatic shift in attitude” among both managers and rank-and-file members of the county’s workforce.

The policies and principles in the settlement agreement are embedded in the county’s practices, Robinson said.

And she said employees who had been demoralized came to believe they would be treated fairly and their work would be judged on its merits.

Shakman’s attorney, Brian I. Hays of Locke Lord LLP, noted no objections were raised to the request that the county be found in substantial compliance.

“This is not an ending, but a new beginning to county employment practices,” Hays said.

The case is Michael L. Shakman, et al. v. County of Cook, et al., No. 69 C 2145.



Recent Headlines

IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM COMMISSIONER SUFFREDIN
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Special to suffredin.org

Cook County Assessor’s Office Publicly Releases Residential Assessment Code and Models
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Special to suffredin.org

EDITORIAL: Long in the MWRD pipeline, IG plan needs a yes vote
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Cook County Health Cuts Ribbon on Outpatient Center in Arlington Heights
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Daily Herald

Celebrate Earth Day with the Forest Preserves of Cook County
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Special to suffredin.org

Homeowners in Chicago have just a few weeks to get current on their 2017 property taxes - or risk losing their homes. WBEZ’s Odette Yousef reports.
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
WBEZ Chiacgo Public Radio

Editorial: The Foxx-Smollett questions for Inspector General Blanchard
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Cook County pet owners warned of spring coyote dangers
Monday, April 15, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Cook County inspector general to review prosecutors' handling of Jussie Smollett case
Saturday, April 13, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Foxx requests Cook County IG investigation into handling of Jussie Smollett case
Friday, April 12, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

A challenge to one of Chicago's biggest draws for companies
Friday, April 12, 2019
Crain's Chicago Business

What Evanston's assessments tell us about the new assessor's new math
Friday, April 12, 2019
Crain's Chicago Business

$3.85 million granted in lawsuit against ex-Cook County forest preserve worker charged in fatal on-the-job crash
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Chicago Tribune

A Day in the Life of a Cook County Burn Crew
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
WTTW News

EDITORIAL: Splitting up the region’s sanitation board is an idea that stinks
Monday, April 08, 2019
Chicago Sun-Times

Lawmakers Look To Keep 10-Year-Olds Out Of Jail
Thursday, April 04, 2019

Property Tax Workshops Help Homeowners Appeal Assessments
Wednesday, April 03, 2019
Evanston RoundTable

Large crowds of Evanston residents turn out to appeal property tax assessments
Tuesday, April 02, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Family of slain cabbie accuses Cook County state's attorney's office of dodging FOIA request
Monday, April 01, 2019
Chicago Tribune

Property Tax Appeal Seminar Set For New Trier Township Residents
Monday, April 01, 2019
Journal and Topics Online

all news items

Paid for by Larry Suffredin and not at taxpayer expense. A Haymarket Production.
^ TOP